Back to Course Dina D’Malchusa Part 2: Informing 0% Complete 0/0 Steps Quiz 1 of 0 Dina D’Malchusa Part 2: Informing Lemaan Yilmedu June 6, 2024 Dina D’Malchusa Part 2: Informing ~ Bankruptcy Time limit: 0 Quiz Summary 0 of 9 Questions completed Questions: Information You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again. Quiz is loading… You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz. You must first complete the following: Results Quiz complete. Results are being recorded. Results 0 of 9 Questions answered correctly Your time: Time has elapsed You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0) Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0) 0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0) Categories Not categorized 0% Show Question 1 Show Question 2 Show Question 3 Show Question 4 Show Question 5 Show Question 6 Show Question 7 Show Question 8 Show Question 9 Review Answered Correct Incorrect Question 1 of 9 1. Question The scenario: A “moser” (“informant”) who informed on others – had died. Are his heirs (or the like) charged to pay for his damages? If he himself had directly caused damage to another’s money – the heirs are required to pay. Correct Incorrect Correct answer The heirs required to pay in their father’s stead. Correct Incorrect Correct answer The heirs are not required to pay in their father’s stead. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Answers 1 and 2 are correct, but it depends according to which opinion. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect Question 2 of 9 2. Question The scenario: A non-Jew forced a Jew – Reuven – to hand over to him the property of another Jew. In turn, Reuven went and showed him Shimon’s property. What is the din? Reuven is exempt from repayment in any event, since it’s a case of coercion (אונס). Correct Incorrect Correct answer Reuven is obligated to repay Shimon’s property, since he shouldn’t have shown the property. Correct Incorrect Correct answer If the non-Jew demanded specifically the property of Shimon, and not any other individual – Reuven is exempt. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Answers 2 and 3 are correct, but it depends according to which opinion. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect Question 3 of 9 3. Question The scenario: A non-Jew forced a Jew – Reuven – to give him the property of another Jew. In turn, Reuven went and handed over to him something of Shimon’s. What is the din? Reuven is exempt from repayment in any event, since it’s a case of coercion (אונס). Correct Incorrect Correct answer If the non-Jew was not near Shimon’s property – Reuven is liable to repay him. Correct Incorrect Correct answer If the non-Jew demanded specifically the property of Shimon, and not any other individual – Reuven is exempt. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Answers 2 and 3 are correct, but it depends according to which opinion. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect Question 4 of 9 4. Question Which type of coercion is one that exempts an informant (“moser”) from repayment? Any type of coercion, even coercion to do something due to monetary concern. Correct Incorrect Correct answer In a case of coercion where one’s life is in danger; Some opinions also include monetary coercion as well. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Only in the case of coercion where one’s life is in danger. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Only in the case where one is coerced by a non-Jewish king or ruler. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect Question 5 of 9 5. Question The scenario: Levi saw Reuven hitting Shimon. May Levi report the incident to the authorities? Only Shimon – who was the one hit – is permitted to report it. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Levi is permitted to report it, in order to protect Shimon. Correct Incorrect Correct answer If Levi knows that Reuven will be punished more than is due him – he is forbidden to report it. Correct Incorrect Correct answer If Shimon cannot be saved by any other method – then even Levi is permitted to do so. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect Question 6 of 9 6. Question Regarding accepting a job as an auditor for income tax and its evasion (i.e., IRS) – what is the din? It is forbidden for one to work in such a job, since it involves being a “moser”. Correct Incorrect Correct answer M’ikar hadin, one is permitted to work as such. However, it is proper to be more stringent. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Lechatchila – one is forbidden to work in this field. If someone is already working in it – he’s not liable as a “moser”. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Answers 2 and 3 are correct, but it depends according to which opinion. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect Question 7 of 9 7. Question In regard to reporting on a driver who is endangering the public with his reckless driving – what is the din? He should be warned. If he still does not listen – he should be reported to the police. Correct Incorrect Correct answer He should be warned. If there isn’t sufficient time for warnings – he may be immediately reported on. Correct Incorrect Correct answer He may be reported on, since he is endangering the public. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Answers 1 and 2 are correct, but it depends according to which opinion. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect Question 8 of 9 8. Question The scenario: An individual stumbled and stole as a one-time thing. Is it permitted to report on the incident? He should not be reported on. Correct Incorrect Correct answer If there is concern that he will continue to steal – it is permitted to report on him. Correct Incorrect Correct answer It is permitted to report on him. Correct Incorrect Correct answer If it is possible to retrieve the stolen money from the thief easily – he should not be reported on. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect Question 9 of 9 9. Question An individual is established to be(“חזקה”) a thief. Is it permitted to report on him? He should not be reported on. Correct Incorrect Correct answer If there is concern that he will continue stealing – it is permitted to report on him. Correct Incorrect Correct answer It is permitted to report on him. Correct Incorrect Correct answer If it is possible to retrieve the stolen money from the thief easily – he should not be reported on. Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect
